OK, I know I’m just re-hashing news, but this one is close to my heart.
A report in the Australian outlines how the 3 Major stations are handling HDTV and how they see it in the future.
CH 10 have been heavily advertising that the Saturday night AFL match will be in HD, and that the major sports events will also be in HD (Rugby World Cup, Formula 1), most of the shows 10 show from the US are shown in HD here.
CH 9, well they have no sport, but again, most shows from the US are now shown in HD here.
Now to my Boxcutters style rant.
Ch 7, Barely show anything in HD, and don’t plan on doing so, not with the AFL (on the home of AFL ;)), most likely not with the 2008 Olympics, but more importantly, the HD that they are showing is in the lowest spec that they can possibly get away with, what jerks!!!
And, then, as I read on, I’m told that the stations are now allowed to multi-cast, show more than one show on the different channels, which then makes me think, why didn’t ‘Hair on Fire 9’ when it was not showing us the cricket, and make us watch ‘Some Advertising Affair’ not just say, switch over to Channel 91 to watch the Cricket? All I can see is TWO advertising streams, and ALL the viewers are happy (excluding those without a HD or SD Set Top Box!). It certainly makes sense to me, but what little hair I have isn’t on fire!
So, in true Boxcutter’s Style, F&^k YOU Channel 7 for not promoting HD and for showing the lowest quality HD you can get away with, and F*&K YOU Channel 9 for not just stiffing us on the cricket, but actually having the ability to show both programs at once and not doing so!
One Comment
Ross says:
Good rant Bolden!!
Couldn’t agree more about 7 and their HD – could it be less short sighted.
And that is the BEST idea for a multi-channel I have ever heard, one stays with the cricket, one goes to the news.